Nowadays, the process of Incorporation of Company has been eased out. However, on the other hand, with an increase in the number of compliances and regulations with heavy penalties for delay, Companies look for options for the exit from the business. Keeping the situations of Companies in mind, the Government has provided specific exit routes for the closure of the Companies. The closure of Companies can be done with the fulfillment of specific documentation and conditions as prescribed by the rules and regulations. Under Companies Act, 2013, the provisions relating to the Power of Registrar for Removal of Name of Company from Register of Companies are provided under Section 248 of the Act.
Removal of Names of Companies by the Registrar of Companies (Roc) from the Register of companies maintained by RoC Section 248 to 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 (the Act) read with the Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the Register of Companies) Rules, 2016 deals with removal of names of the Companies from the Register of Companies.
The same has been notified with effect from 26th December 2016.
Similar provisions were under Section 560 of the Companies Act, 1956 and the procedure for strike off the name of the Company was more or less the same. Now powers are widely used by RoC to weed out companies which are non- compliant and not doing any business.
As on date, there are three ways to close a company.
There is difference between above methods, but in this article we will discuss about striking of company.
Striking off of company simply means closing of a defunct company, in fast way. It is simplest way to close a company. Any company that wants to strike off its name from the registrar of the company can declare itself defunct by applying Form FTE (Fast Track Exit mode) and then the company can be shut down by the registrar of the company.On certain condition, a company name could be removed from the MCA database or even struck-off by the Companies Registrar. Let us take a quick glance at the procedure for striking or removal of company name from MCA database.
Registrar of companies (RoC) strike off
Removal of Names of Companies by the Registrar of Companies (Roc) from the Register of companies maintained by RoC Section 248 to 252 of the Companies Act, 2013
S. No. | Sections | Purpose |
1. | Section 248 | Power of Registrar to remove the name of Companies from the Register of companies maintained by RoC |
2. | Section 249 | Restrictions on making application under section 248 in certain situations |
3. | Section 250 | Effect of the company notified as dissolved |
4. | Section 251 | Fraudulent Application for removal of name |
5. | Section 252 | Appeal to Tribunal |
The expression “defunct company”, means a company which is not operating or functioning; not carrying on any business or in operation. Generally it is evident from the latest available balance sheet of a company. Again, if a company is not filing its balance sheet for many years then also the concerned Registrar of Companies (ROC) has reasonable cause to believe that the company is not in operation.
A company which is in the course of being wound-up voluntarily is still in operation within the meaning of the section. A company, although not carrying on business, may be in operation. A company, if it is operating as a company, for doing something in relation to its past obligations or to avoid future pecuniary liability, it will be deemed to be in operation. Such companies cannot be dissolved by following the procedure mentioned in Sec. 248 of the Act.
Important Provisions of Law on Striking OffRegistrar of Companies has been empowered to strike off names of those companies who are not carrying on any business or are not in operation after following the prescribed procedure given in the section. Once satisfied, the ROC shall strike the name of the company off the Register, and shall publish notice thereof in the Official Gazette and the company stands dissolved. The Registrar is not bound to remove a company from the register, even though an application has been made for the purpose, and it has come to his notice that the company is not functioning or that its members have been reduced to less than seven. Where the object of the application to the Registrar under this section is to avoid liability on a suit pending against the company, the application must be rejected.
Under two circumstances ROC has been empowered to strike off the names of companies under liquidation.
In these two circumstances as mentioned above, the ROC has to send a notice by registered post about striking off its name from the Register to the company, if no liquidator is acting and to the liquidator, if the required returns are not forthcoming from him.
(ii). Position of Company’s Creditors after Striking OffThe striking off the name of a company does not materially affect the creditors of the company, because such creditors may-
Normal course for winding up of a dissolved company would have been that the company’s name be first restored and then the winding up order by the court is made. Court can order winding up of a company, even without the company being first restored.
(iv). Restoration of Company within 20 YearsA company dissolved can be restored on the Register of Companies by a Court order and while restoring, the Court may, by the order, give such directions and make such provisions as seen just for placing the company and all other persons in the same position as nearly as may be as if the name of the company had not been struck off.
An application for restoration can only be made by the company, member or creditor. It must be shown that at the date when the company was dissolved, the petitioner was a member or creditor thereof, and anyone, whether in ignorance of the dissolution or not, who purported to become a member or creditor afterwards, was not so qualified. One, who acquires shares or a debt of a company whose name has been struck off the register, and who at the time of acquisition has knowledge of that fact, is not a ‘person aggrieved’ within this sub-section.
A third party unless he is a creditor has no locus standi to apply. The expressions “member” or “creditor” includes the personal representatives of a deceased member or creditor.
When a suit is actually pending against a company and is being contested by it at the time of removal of its name from the register, it is proper to direct the restoration of the name of the company, particularly when the directors were aware of the fact of the contested litigation and were actually taking part in it.
Any defunct company desirous of getting its name strike off the Register under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013 shall make an application in the Form FTE, annexed electronically on the Ministry of Corporate Affairs portal namely www.mca.gov.in accompanied by filing fee of 10,000/-; being digitally signed by any of the director or Manager or Secretary, and certified by a Chartered Accountant in whole time practice or Company Secretary in whole time practice or Cost Accountant in whole time practice.
In case, the applicant name is not available in the database of directors maintained by the Ministry, the application shall be accompanied by certificate from a Chartered Accountant in whole time practice or Company Secretary in whole time practice or Cost Accountant in whole time practice along with their membership number, certifying that the applicants are present directors of the company. In such cases, the applicants shall not be asked to file Form 32 and Form DIN 3.
Any defunct company which has active status or identified as dormant by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, may apply for getting its name strike off from the Register of Companies.
Any defunct company which is a Government Company shall submit ‘No Objection Certificate’ issued by the concerned Administrative Ministry or Department or State Government along with the application. The decision of the Registrar of Companies in respect of striking off the name of company shall be final.
The company shall disclose pending litigations if any, involving the company while applying under FTE (Fast Track Exit mode). Form FTE shall further be accompanied by an Indemnity Bond, duly notarized, and accompanied by an affidavit. In case of foreign nationals and NRIs, Indemnity Bond and Affidavit may be notarized as per their respective country’s law.
An alternative mechanism to the Winding up of a Company is striking off the Company.
Note: Section 8 company cannot get strike off voluntary.
The Companies Act facilitates two modes of strike-off
Grounds on which provision of Strike-off could be enacted (Section 248)
Note: Dormant means inactive or inoperative, a Company is dormant where it has been registered under Companies Act for future project or to hold an assets or intellectual property but isn’t pursuing any significant accounting transactions.
According to section 455 of Companies Act, 2013 Dormant Company is an inactive company which has not been carrying any business or has not made any significant accounting transaction in the last two financial years.
Such company may make an application to the Registrar for obtaining the status of a dormant company.
Concurrently, the Registrar may also suo motu direct such a company for the status of a dormant company. The Registrar on consideration of the application allow the status of a dormant company to the applicant and issue a certificate in Form MSC-1&2 to that effect. The Registrar shall maintain a register of Dormant Companies under the portal maintained by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs. A company, once identified as dormant, will need to maintain only a minimum number of Directors and pay some annual fees as prescribed in the Companies (Registration Offices and Fees) Rules, 2014.Such companies could be restarted at a later stage, without actually going through the administrative process of closing down the existing company by making an application. The dormant companies can become active by, making an application.The Ministry had introduced Easy Exit Schemes, 2010 and 2011 for companies that were inactive on or after 1st April, 2008. In July, Guidelines were issued for ‘Fast Track Exit Mode’ for simplified exit of defunct companies that have been inactive since their incorporation or for 1 year.If the Dormant Company fails to comply with the requirements of the Section 455 of the Companies Act, 2013 the Registrar shall have the power to strike off its name.
Conditions for Obtaining Status of Dormant CompanyA company shall be eligible to apply for status of dormant company only, if-
Forms | Purpose |
Form MSC-1 | Application for obtaining the status of a Dormant Company |
Form MSC-2 | Issue a certificate of a Dormant Company |
Form MSC-3 | Filing a “Return of Dormant Company” annually |
Form MSC-4 | Application for obtaining the status of an active company |
Form MSC-5 | Issue a certificate of an active company |
Forms | Particulars | Responsibility |
STK-1 | Notice from RoC for strike off | RoC |
STK-2 | Application for removal of name of the Company | Company |
STK-3 | Indemnity Bond | Directors |
STK-4 | Affidavit | Directors |
STK-5 | Publication of notice in case notice for strike off received from ROC | RoC |
STK-6 | Publication of notice in case of Voluntary strike off. | RoC |
STK-7 | Notice of striking off and dissolution of Company | RoC |
Following categories of companies name under rule 4 shall not be removed by RoC:
Apart from the above mentioned companies, all other companies are eligible for the strike off if the criteria for the strike off are met.
The Registrar’s satisfaction that the company is not carrying on business is to be based on the records available with him, particularly in respect of the companies which have not filed the prescribed returns/documents, e.g., annual return and balance-sheets for the past years. The name of a company can also be struck off by the ROC at the instance of the company under this section.
Striking off by Registrar on his own motionWhere the Registrar has reasonable cause to believe that a company is not carrying on business or in operation; he shall send to the company by post a letter inquiring whether the company is carryingon business or in operation. The company should be given one month time to reply.
If the Registrar does not within one month of sending the letter mentioned above receive any answer thereto, send to the company second letter referring to the first letter, and stating that –
– No answer to the first letter has been received; and
– If an answer is not received to the second letter within one month from the date thereof, a notice will be
published in the Official Gazette with a view to striking the name of the company off the register.This second letter should be sent within fourteen days after the expiry of one month after sending the first letter and it should be sent by registered post.
If, in response to the second letter, the Registrar –
– Either receives an answer from the company to the effect that it is not carrying on business or in operation,or
– does not within one month after sending the second letter receive any answer, he may proceed to strike the company off the Register of Companies. This will be done by taking two steps:
(a) sending for publishing in the Official Gazette, a notice to the effect that, at the expiration of three months from the date of that notice, the name of the company mentioned therein will, unless cause is shown to the contrary, be struck off the register and the company will be dissolved; and
(b) Sending to the company as well as to the income-tax authorities the above-mentioned notice by registered post. Similar procedure of publication of the notice in official Gazette shall be adopted by the Registrar in case of a company in liquidation, where the Registrar is satisfied that either no liquidator is acting or that the affairs of the company have been completely wound up and the returns required to be filed by the liquidator have not been filed for a period of six months. A copy of such notice shall also be forwarded to the company or the liquidator, as applicable, by registered post.
At the expiry of three months from the date of the notice mentioned above, the Registrar may, unless cause to the contrary is previously shown by the company, strike its name off the register, and shall publish notice thereof in the Official Gazette. On the publication in the Official Gazette of this notice, the company shall stand dissolved.
The MCA is December, 2016 brought to force Section 248 to 252 of the Companies Act, 2013 to lay the foundation for removal of company name from Register of Companies. As per Section 248 to 252, the Registrar of Companies has the following powers to remove name of company from the register of companies. The Companies Registrar can strike-off or remove a company name if he or she has a reasonable cause to think of:
An organization fails to start its business within a year of its incorporation
The memorandum subscribers have not reimbursed the subscription within 180-days from the company’s incorporation and a declaration regarding that effect has not been filed
The company is not carrying on any business or operations, as revealed after the physical verification after registered office of company is found by Registrar of Companies.
An organization has not yet been carrying on any operation or business for a time period of about two years immediately prior to the financial years without making an application for the getting the status of a dormant company
If such is the case, the Registrar can remove the name of the company from the register of companies by sending a notice to the company and all the directors of the company. The notice from ROC would present the ROC’s intention to remove the name of the company from the register of companies and request the company to send representations along with copies of the relevant documents, if any, within a period of thirty days from the date of the notice.
As far as the notice is concerned, the Registrar would request the organization and its directors for sending their representations together with the copies of relevant documents.While obtaining the notice, the organization by a special consent or resolution of 75% of shareholders based on paid-up share capital could file a reason for the purpose of removing the company name from MCA database. Once the application is received, the Registrar would cause a notice to be issued.
Hence, to sum up Strike off by ROC will be as follows:
An application for striking-off the company’s name would not be made in the preceding three months if the company has:
The company changed its name or shifted its registered office from one State to another before three months of filing of Form STK-2;
The company disposed property or rights held by it, before three months of filing of Form STK-2. This provision is not applicable for trade wherein disposal of property for gain is in the normal course of trading or carrying on of business;
The company has made an application to the Tribunal for the sanctioning of a compromise or arrangement and the matter has not been finally concluded;
The company is being wound up voluntarily under Companies Act or under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
The company engaged in any other activity except the one which is provided in the MOA or expedient before three months of filing of Form STK-2.
If a company satisfies any of the above condition, form STK-2 cannot be filed.
Penalty of not adhering with the requirement mentioned under Companies Act, 2013Before filing application with the ROC for strike off the company, do check the following:
Make sure that the company has filed its up to date all the financial statements and annual return with the Registrar of Companies before making application for strike off.
The company does not have any management disputes or there is no litigation pending with regard to management or shareholding of the company and No order is in operation stay behind filing of the documents by a court or tribunal or any other competent authority
Make sure that company has failed to commence its business within one year of its incorporation or Company is not carrying on any business or operation for a period of two immediately preceding financial years and has not made any application within such period for obtaining the status of a dormant company under section 455.
No technical scrutiny, inquiry, inspection or investigation is ordered or pending against the company by any competent authority.
If the Registrar has reasonable grounds to believe that the company is not carrying on any business or operations even after 180 days of incorporation and have not filed declaration in Form -20 A, the registrar may remove the name of the company from the Register of companies as it cannot Start Business activity and Exercise any borrowing power under section 10A.
The Registrar of Companies (ROC) should send the notice to all the Directors stating the intention for the Removal the name of Company from the Register of Companies.
The Directors should send the reply of notice sent by the Registrar of Companies (ROC) with a copy of relevant documents.
All assets and liabilities of the Company should be extinguished before the Removal of Name of Company from Register of Companies.
No pending litigations should be there against the Company.
A Special Resolution should be passed in the Extraordinary General Meeting or consent of 75% of the shareholders in terms of the paid-up capital should be given for the Removal of Name of Company from Register of Company.
In the year when the Company ceased to carry on business or operations, the annual returns and financial statements should be filed up till the end of that financial year.
Companies on the pursuit of strike-off must file an application to the Registrar of Companies (ROC), accompanied by the following documents:
After receiving application for Strike off, the ROC shall publish a notice in FORM STK-5 of the same for inviting objections, if any.
Forms Filed With the Registrar of Companies for Strike Off Of CompanyThe Registrar of Companies (ROC) should give notice for Removal of Name of Company to all the Directors of Company in writing in Form SKT-1 at the addresses available in records by registered post or by speed post.
The notice should contain the reasons for the Removal of Name of the Company. The notice shall also seek representations against the action proposed by the Registrar. The Directors should give the representations within 30 days from the date of the notice with the relevant documents as prescribed.
The notice issued should be published in Form STK-5, Form SKT-6, and also in the Official Gazette to inform the general public.
After the expiry of the time mentioned in the notice, the Registrar of Companies can remove the name of Company from Register of Companies. The Registrar of Companies (ROC) should also publish the same in the Official Gazette, and on publication in Official Gazette, the Company should stand dissolve.
The Registrar of Companies should satisfy himself/herself that adequate provisions have been made for discharging all the liabilities and obligations and realizing all amounts due to Company within a reasonable time by the Company before passing an order under Section 248(5) of the Companies Act, 2013. In case if it is necessary, the Registrar of Companies can take some undertaking from the persons in charge of the management of Company, or Directors, or Managing Directors.
After Removal of Name of Company, the Registrar of Companies should cause a notice of Removal of Name of Company to be published in Official Gazette in Form SKT-7, and the same should be published on the website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA).
The registrar shall send a notice to the company and all the directors of the company, at their registered address, of his intention to remove the name of the company from the register of companies and requesting them to send their representations along with copies of the relevant documents, if any, within a period of thirty days from the date of the notice.” The notice shall be issued in form STK-1.The Notice shall contain the reasons or grounds on which the name of the Company is to be removed. The Registrar may remove the company’s name from the companies register in terms of the Act of Section 248, provided that the organization should not be under category covered under the rule 4.
(II). Application for the removal of Company’s nameThe Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) has recently announced Form STK-2 for removing name from register of companies, i.e., winding up of a company. Form STK-2 will be made available by the MCA from the 5th of April, 2017 for filing on the MCA platform.An application for the removal of company’s name under sub-section of Section 248 should be made in the Form STK-2 together with the fee of 10,000. Every application under the sub-rule should accompany a no-objection certificate from the appropriate Regulatory Authority related to the following companies, namely:
The Form STK 2 will be verified by the chartered account or company secretary or even cost accountant in the whole-time practice.
(IV). Closing of Company by Filing Form STK-2After filing of Form STK-2 by the company, the Registrar has the powers and duty to satisfy him/herself that sufficient provision has been made for the realization of all amounts due to the company and for the payment or discharge of its liabilities and obligations by the company within a reasonable time. If necessary, the ROC can also obtain necessary undertakings from the managing director, director or other persons in charge of the management of the company. On completion of the above formalities, the ROC would cause a public notice to be issued regarding the intended closure of the company. After expiry of the time mentioned in the notice, the Registrar can, strike off its name from the register of companies, and publish notice of striking-off of name of company in the Official Gazette. On publication in the Official Gazette of this notice, the company is held to be dissolved.
All types of companies like private limited company, one person company, limited company can apply for closure using Form STK-2. The following are the enclosures that must be attached with
Form STK-2:Form STK 2 should be certified by a Chartered Accountant in full-time practice or Company Secretary in full-time Practice or Cost Accountant in whole time practice.
(VII). Notice for Striking Off Company Name by RoC in Form STK-7 & Publication of notice in case notice for strike off received from ROC in Form STK-5A notice issued by the ROC for striking off the company name or application filed by a company for striking off its name should be published in the Official Gazette for informing the general public. The ROC will strike off the company name from the Register of Companies upon the expiry of the specified time in the notice for striking off unless the company shows the contrary reason for the same within the mentioned time.During the expiry of time given in the notice, the Company Registrar will remove the organization name from MCA database followed by publishing a notice in the Official Gazette.Once the notice gets published in the Gazette officially, the company will stand dissolved. Even though the company will be dissolved as above mentioned, the tribunal would still have power for winding up an organization whose name was removed from the companies register.The ROC will publish the dissolution notice in the Official Gazette after striking off the company name in the Register of Companies. Upon publication of the notice in the Official Gazette, the company will stand dissolved.
Before passing an order of company dissolution and striking off the company name, the ROC will satisfy itself that sufficient provision is made for the payment or discharge of company liabilities, the realization of amounts due to the company and its obligations within a reasonable time.The ROC will also obtain the necessary undertaking from the director, managing director or other persons in charge of the company management in this regard.However, the company’s assets will be available for the discharge or payment of its obligations and liabilities even after the date of the order of removing the company name from the Register of Companies.The liability of every manager, director, or other officer exercising any power of management and every member of the dissolved company will continue, and it can be enforced as if the company had not been dissolved.
If STK-2 is filed and accepted by the ROC, the company would be dissolved under section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013. Further, the business would cease to operate as a company and the Certificate of Incorporation issued to it shall be deemed to have been cancelled from such date –except for the purpose of realizing the amount due to the company and for the payment or discharge of the liabilities or obligations of the company.Also, if a company is closed using Form STK-2, the liability of all director, manager or other officer who was exercising any power of management and of every member of the company would continue and can be enforced as if the company had not been dissolved. When a company is dissolved under Section 248 of the Act after issuing notice in the Official Gazette, it ceases to operate from the date mentioned in the notice published in the Official Gazette.The Certificate of Incorporation issued by the ROC shall be deemed to be cancelled from the date of such dissolution. However, the Certificate of Incorporation will be valid for payment or discharge of the company liabilities, realizing the amount due to the company and discharge of company obligations.
(IX). Appeal to Tribunal against Dissolution of CompanyAny individual aggrieved by the ROC order notifying that a company is dissolved under Section 248 of the Act can file an appeal to the Tribunal within three years from the ROC order date.The Tribunal can pass an order to restore the company name in the Registrar of Companies if it is of the belief that the removal of the company name is not justified due to the absence of the grounds on which the ROC passed the order. The Tribunal should give a reasonable opportunity to the ROC, the company and all the concerned persons of making representations and hearing.The company should file a copy of the order passed by the Tribunal with the ROC within thirty days from the Tribunal order date. Upon receipt of the order, the ROC shall restore the company name in the Register of Companies and issue a fresh Certificate of Incorporation.The ROC can apply to the Tribunal seeking restoration of the company name if it is satisfied that the company name has been struck off from the Register of Companies based on incorrect information furnished by the directors or company or inadvertently and requires restoration. The ROC can file to the Tribunal to restore the company name on the Register of Companies within three years from the dissolution order’s date.
There are a number of different reasons why a company director might choose to have their company struck off the Companies House Register. Here are a few common examples:
Any company other than Section 8 company (non -profit organization) may as per section 248(2) of the Act , may voluntarily make an application for striking off the name of the Company from the Register of companies maintained by ROC, after extinguishing all its liabilities , by obtaining approval of 75% members in terms of paid up share capital or consent by way of special resolution on any of the ground that it has not started or commenced its business or it is not carrying on business or operation for a period of two immediately preceding financial years and not made any application for obtaining the status of the company as a dormant company. A Company which is regulated under a special Act is required to obtain approval of the regulatory body constituted or established under that Act.
This process for removing a company name from the register of companies can also be initiated by the company by filing Form STK-2. To file Form STK-2, the company should have extinguished all its liabilities and execute a special resolution for removal of company name from register of companies with the consent of 75% of members in terms of paid-up share capital. In case the company is regulated under a special Act, approval of the regulatory body constituted or established under that Act should also be obtained and enclosed with the application. While applying for striking off of company, two forms are required:-
While E-form MGT-14 has normal associated fees, E-form STK-2 has fees of 10,000/-
Section 248(2) of Companies Act, 2013, provided that a Company on its own accord can go for the Removal of Name of Company from Register of Companies.The Company can make an application to the Registrar of Companies for the Removal of Name of Company on all or any of the grounds specified in Section 248(1) of Companies Act, 2013. The Company must extinguish all its assets and liabilities before making an application. The consent of all shareholders is needed to go further for filing the application for Removal of Name of Company from Register of Companies.The Registrar of Companies (ROC), on receipt of the application from the Company, can cause a public notice for the same in the manner prescribed. If a company is regulated under any Special Act, an approval in the form of No objection Certificate (NOC) should be obtained from the regulatory body established under the Special Act.
A) A company can get apply for striking off voluntary after satisfying the below given conditions:-
B) By Registrar of companies on finding of any of below given grounds:-
The company cannot apply for striking off the company name if, at any time in the past three months, the company:
If a company applies for striking off its name in violation of the above conditions, it can be punishable with a fine that may extend to 1 lakh.
The procedure is very simple and is done step wise:-
Before 10th May, 2019, no such specific provision existed in Company law which required any company intending to apply for strike off its name from the register of companies to file overdue returns (Form AOC-4 or Form AOC-4 XBRL, as the case may be, and Form MGT-7) before filing striking off application. The Registrars, in some cases were accepting striking off application without requiring companies to file such overdue returns and in some cases, companies were asked to file overdue returns. But now, w.e.f. May 10, 2019, MCA has made a provision applicable across India by which companies are mandatorily required to file overdue returns prior to filing striking off application. Further, MCA has increased the fees for filing striking off application by a company from 5,000 to 10,000. This again, will hamper small companies who are unable to continue business due to unavoidable circumstances. On one side, Government has lowered the incorporation fees to zero for small companies but on other side, fees for exit option have been doubled.
The following documents are attached with the E-forms:-
Note: Annual filing is necessary before applying for strike off but ROC may approve forms without annual filing if ROC finds there have been no transactions and bank account is not operational.
Other documents which are required for closure of the CompanyProcedure of Application: In order to make an application for voluntary strike off; the Company needs to follow the below mentioned procedure:
Draft an appeal under section 252, in Form No. NCLT 9, with such modifications as may be necessary.
Serve a copy of the appeal, to the Concerned ROC and Income Tax department.
Submit the original appeal to NCLT (National Company Law Tribunal).
On the date of the hearing notified by NCLT appear before NCLT and present the case producing sufficient grounds for revival of Company and repudiate the claim of ROC that Company is not carrying on the business or ceased to be in business for the past two years.
After hearing both the parties NCLT shall pass the order restoring the name of a company in the register of companies.
File the copy of the order with the Registrar of Companies within a period of 30 days from the date of the order.
File pending financial statements and annual returns with the Registrar within such time as may be directed by the Tribunal.
The Registrar of Companies will change the status of the Company from ‘Strike- off’ to ‘Active’.
The effect of an order of restoration of the name of a company under this section is to place the company whose name was struck off by the Registrar in the same position as if the name of the company had never been struck off during the interregnum. If a court of competent jurisdiction directs restoration of the name of the company, it shall be deemed to have continued throughout.The effect of the provision that the company should be “deemed to have continued in existence as if its name had not been struck off” was not only that the corporate existence of the company was preserved, but was also retrospective, so that at the date of the hearing of the application the company was to be regarded as never having been dissolved.Another consequence was that the rights of all parties would be as though there had been no cessation or interruption in the existence of the company on account of the striking off and subsequent restoration.Company Law Board has no power to restore the company, as the powers under that section were vested in the High Court.
Restoration would be ordered subject to fulfillment of applicable formalities in the following cases-
The courts in most cases have allowed restoration after satisfying that the company did not cease to operate but there was a compliance failure (whosoever may be responsible) and the compliance failure needs to be punished. Accordingly, the court while allowing restoration has imposed exemplary punishment in the form of penalties, costs, late fee etc. on company and setting it as the condition for curing the compliance defaults.
S. No. | Rules/Sections | Particulars | |
---|---|---|---|
1. | Section – 248: Power of Registrar to Remove Name of Company from ROC: | ||
Sec – 248(1): | Where the Registrar has reasonable cause to believe that:
(a). a company has failed to commence its business within 1 year of its Date of Incorporation or; (b). Omitted (c). a company is not carrying on any business or operation:
(d). the subscribers to the MOA have not paid the subscription which they had undertaken:
(e). the company is not carrying on any business or operations, as revealed after the physical verification carried out U/s.12(9). |
||
Sec – 248(2): | Without prejudice to the provisions of section – 248(1), a company may,
the Registrar shall, on receipt of such application, cause a public notice to be issued in the prescribed manner: |
||
Sec – 248(3): | Section – 248(2) shall not apply to a company registered under Section 8. | ||
Sec – 248(4): | A notice issued U/s. 248(1) or (2) shall be published in the prescribed manner and also in the Official Gazette for the information of the general public. | ||
Sec – 248(5): | At the expiry of the time mentioned in the notice, the Registrar may, unless cause to the contrary is shown by the company:
|
||
Sec – 248(6): | The Registrar, before passing an order U/s. 248(5), shall satisfy himself that:
Provided that notwithstanding the undertakings, the assets of the company shall be made available for the payment or discharge of all its liabilities and obligations even after the date of the order of removing the name of the company from the ROC. |
||
Sec – 248(7): | The liability, if any,
shall continue and may be enforced as if the company had not been dissolved. |
||
Sec – 248(8): | Nothing in this section shall affect the power of the Tribunal: to wind up a company the name of which has been struck off from the ROC. |
S. No. | Rules/Sections | Particulars | |
---|---|---|---|
2. | Section – 249: Restrictions on Making Application U/s. 248 in Certain Situations. | ||
Sec – 249(1): | An application U/s. 248(2), on behalf of a company shall not be made if, at any time in the previous 3 months, the company:
(a). has changed its name or shifted its registered office from one State to another; (b). has made a disposal for value of property or rights held by it,
(c). has engaged in any other activity except the one which is
(d). has made an application to the Tribunal for the sanctioning of a compromise or arrangement and the matter has not been finally concluded; or (e). is being wound up under Chapter XX of this Act or under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. |
||
Sec – 249(2): | Penalty for violation of section – 248(1): Fine – Maximum 1,00,000/- |
||
Sec – 249(3): | An application filed U/s. 248(2):
as soon as conditions U/s. 248(1) are brought to his notice. |
||
3. | Section – 250: Effect of Company Notified as Dissolved: | ||
Sec – 250: | Where a company stands dissolved U/s. 248:
|
||
4. | Section – 251: Fraudulent Application for Removal of Name: | ||
Sec – 251(1): | Where it is found that an application by a company U/s. 248(2), has been made with the object of:
the persons in charge of the management of the company shall, notwithstanding that the company has been notified as dissolved:
|
||
Sec – 251(2): | Without prejudice to the provisions contained in section – 248(1): Registrar may also recommend prosecution of the persons responsible for the filing of an application U/s. 248(2). | ||
5. | Section – 252: Appeal to Tribunal: | ||
Sec – 252(1): | Any person aggrieved by an order of the Registrar, notifying a company as dissolved U/s. 248,may, file an appeal to the Tribunal:
Provided that before passing any order U/s. 252(1), the Tribunal shall:
Provided further that if the Registrar is satisfied that:
he may within a period of 3 years from the date of passing of the order dissolving the company U/s. 248, file an application before the Tribunal seeking restoration of name of such company. |
||
Sec – 252(2): | A copy of the order passed by the Tribunal:
on receipt of the order, the Registrar shall cause:
|
||
Sec – 252(3): | If a company, or any member or creditor or workman thereof feels aggrieved by the company:
may, if satisfied that the company was at the time of its name being struck off:
and the Tribunal may, by the order,
|
S. No. | Rules/Sections | Particulars | |
---|---|---|---|
6. | Rule3: Removal of name of company from the Register on suo-motu basis: | ||
Rule-3(1): | The ROC may remove the name of a company from the ROC in terms of section 248(1) of the Act:
Provided that following categories of companies shall not be removed from the ROC under this rule – 3 and 4, namely:
vanishing company” means a company,
|
||
Rule-3(2): | For the purpose of rule – 3(1),
|
||
Rule-3(3): | The notice shall contain:
|
||
7. | Rule-4: Application for removal of name of company: | ||
Rule-4(1): | An application for removal of name of the company U/s. 248(2) shall be made in Form STK-2 along with the fee of 10,000:
Provided that no application in Form No. STK-2 shall be filed by a company unless it has
Provided further that in case a company intends to file Form No.STK-2
Provided also that once notice in Form No. STK-7 has been issued
|
||
Rule-4(2): | Every application under rule – 3(1) shall accompany a no objection certificate from appropriate Regulatory Authority concerned in respect of following companies, namely :-
|
||
Rule-4(3): | The application in Form STK-2 shall be accompanied by:
(i). indemnity bond duly notarized by every director in Form STK-3; Provided that in case of a:
(ii). a statement of accounts in Form No. STK-8 containing assets and liabilities of the company made up to a day, not more than 30 days before the date of application and certified by a Chartered Accountant; |
Points of difference | Strike-off | winding up |
Legal risks | Striking your company off from the Companies Register is only possible if there are no threats of legal action against your business and no pending or ongoing insolvency procedures taking place. The company must be solvent and all parties (including creditors, employees, shareholders and directors) must be informed. | The appointment of a liquidator to manage the process ensures that all legal requirements are met. A Declaration of Solvency must be signed by the directors of the company to confirm the company can pay all its debts within a maximum of one year. |
Personal liability | If a creditor has not been informed about the strike off and subsequently makes a claim or if any irregularities come to light, your conduct as a director could be investigated, potentially leading to personal liability for company debt and even disqualification as a director. | If you sign the Declaration of Solvency and it later emerges that company debts exist, you could be made personally liable. |
Cost involved | Strike off is an informal process that involves a relatively small amount of administration.It can be completed by the company directors themselves and costs less. | It is a formal process for winding up a solvent business that involves far more administration and must be carried out by a licensed insolvency practitioner. It costs more. |
The company having been struck off the register or any member or creditor of such company may make an application to the High Court if the company or the member or creditor feels aggrieved by the company having been struck off, for the restoration of the company to the register. Such an application must be made before the expiry of 20 years from the publication in the Official Gazette of the notice of the striking-off.
The High Court may order the name of the company to be restored to the register, if it is satisfied that-
The procedure for making application to the High is as under:-
One of the reasons for exercising the High Court’s direction in favor of restoring a company must be that after restoration the company will be in a position to carry on the business of the company. High Court would not exercise discretion when there is no evidence of substantial benefit to member or creditors.In such a case the court may, by the order, give such directions and make such provision as seem just for placing the company and all other persons in the same position as nearly as may be as if the name of the company had not been struck off.
The company must file electronically with the Registrar a certified true copy of the order passed by the Court, along with e-form-21. Upon a certified copy of the order being delivered to the Registrar for registration, the company shall be deemed to have continued in existence as if its name had not been struck off.
Under Section 248 of Companies Act, 2013, the Power of Registrar for Removal of Name of Company from Register of Companies (ROC) is provided. The Registrar can go for the Removal of Name by itself, or the Company can itself go for Removal of Name. Unlike other methods, the mode prescribed under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013, is the most efficient and speedy way for the closure of the Company. The Registrar of Companies (ROC) plays a vital role in the closure of the Company. Hence, the Company should take due care while making replies to the notices of the Registrar of Companies (ROC). The process of closing of Company under Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013, is lengthy and long-lasting.
In the last few months of FY 2016-17, RoC across country had started issuing Show Cause Notices u/s 248 (1) for striking off the name of approx. 4 Lac companies and giving them a time limit of 30 days to give appropriate replies, or represent their case, failing which the name of these 4 Lac companies may be struck off by RoC. The possible intention behind issuing Show Cause Notices to the companies was to reduce the burden of RoC in maintaining their records for such Companies. This was a welcome move by RoC, which will be helpful to the defunct Companies also, as strike off is an easy, fast and cheapest way of closing down a Company. RoC will be free from large number of such non compliant companies and then he can rather spend more time to ensure that proper corporate governance and compliances are made by companies.
However, such issuance of Show Cause Notices has left us with various questions unanswered as to whether the Director would be disqualified u/s 164(2) of the Act? Whether the office of the Director would be considered as vacant u/s 167 (1) (a) of the Act? What will the liabilities on members and directors be as mentioned under the show cause notice issued by RoC? Whether there is any levy of penalty on the directors of the Company u/s. 166 of the Companies Act, 2013 due to non-compliance of their duties? One can form an opinion that RoC may send show cause notice and prosecute the Directors of such companies for violation of non-filing of Balance Sheet and Annual Return of past period and such Directors may have to file application for compounding of such offence, till than they may be considered as disqualified as Director and his office shall be considered as vacant not only from these companies but all other companies where he is Director.
Striking off of company simply means closing of a defunct company, in fast way. It is simplest way to close a company.
Note: The companies are governed by the companies Act, 2013 and its section 248 governs the striking off of company.A company can get strike off in two ways:-
A) By company itself as Voluntary Striking off
B) By Registrar of Companies
Note: Section 8 company cannot get strike off voluntary.
Companies on whom Strike off under Section 248 is not applicable are as follows:
The following companies are eligible for opting for strike off:
The procedure is very simple and is done step wise:-
Once an application is made for striking off of company by filing E-form STK-2, the concerned Registrar of Companies (ROC) after verifying the documents will strike off the name of company and this procedure normally takes 3-4 month. However, if any objection is received from Registrar of Companies (ROC) this process might take extra time or even reject the application.
The notice u/s 248(1) of the Companies Act, 2013 is in Form STK-5 and U/s. 248(2) in Form STK-6. Such notices are:
When the said notice is published U/s. 248(1), the prescribed form for the same is Form STK-5A (Publication of notice in case notice for strike off received from ROC), while for the purpose of section 248(2), the prescribed form remains the same, i.e., Form STK-6 (Publication of notice in case of Voluntary strike off).
The Companies (Removal of Names of Companies from the ROC) Rules, 2016 have been amended to include Form STK-5A, i.e., a standard Public Notice to the companies to be issued by the Registrar in pursuance of section 248(1) and (4) of the Act stating the reason for proposing removal of a company’s name from the ROC and requisitioning objections if any within a period of 30 days from the date of publication of the notice.
The closure of a limited company depends on whether it is solvent (able to pay its bills) or insolvent (unable to pay its bills). If it is solvent, the easiest way to close it is for the directors to apply to Registrar of Companies to have it struck off the register. Alternatively, you can start a members’ voluntary liquidation. If your company is insolvent, the directors can propose a creditors’ voluntary liquidation process.This course of action will require at least 75% of the voting shareholders (by the value of their shares) to agree to the closure by passing a winding-up resolution. In certain situations, a company can be forced to close by its creditors or RoC.
A Private Limited Company can be closed down in various manners depending on the requirement of the owner.
A company can be sold by transferring the majority of shares to the person best suited for the company. The procedure of eventually winds up the company, but only the majority of the shares are transferred with the responsibility of stocks.
Declaring the company Defunct:Any company that wants to strike off its name from the registrar of the company can declare itself defunct by applying Form FTE and then the company can be shut down by the registrar of the company.
Winding Up of Private Limited Company:Winding up of the private limited company is necessary in the case where the company needs to conclude its business or due to bankruptcy. The winding-up method can be initiated intentionally by the shareholders or creditors, or it can also be done on the order of the tribunal (Compulsory Winding-up).
If the company is not dissolved and the assets are not collected as per the legal proceedings, the company is considered in operation, and hence the directors will be liable for completing all the compliances associated with the private limited company.
Companies may pursue a strike-off by following each of the following specified steps:
Holding of Board Meeting:The passing of Board Resolutions has been mandated for major enactments in the corporate sphere.
Closing of liabilities:A company desirous of a strike-off must have closed off all its liabilities.
Holding of General Meeting:A general meeting of shareholders should be held by the company by passing a resolution for striking off the name of the Company.
Furnishing of Applications and documents:Companies on the pursuit of strike-off must file an application to the Registrar of Companies (ROC), accompanied by the following documents:
If a company confirms its dissolvement, it shall cease its operations as a company from the date of such dissolvement, and the Certificate of Incorporation issued to it by the ROC shall be deemed to have been canceled, except for the discharge of any existing liabilities or obligations.
There are serious consequences for directors of companies which are involuntarily struck off, particularly if the company is still trading.
Step by Step procedure for Revival of Company:
When a company is struck off, the name would be removed from the company register and it cannot trade, sell its assets or make payments or even it cannot get involved in any other business activities. The name of the company would be made available for new companies to use.
The Company which is likely to be struck off must file an application to the registrar of the companies, along with the following documents:
Yes
Form INC-20A: For all company registered after 2nd Nov 2018.
Form INC- 22A: For all companies registered before 31st Dec 2017. (This will depend on case to case)
The company cannot be struck off if in the last three months:
Circumstances under which strike off cannot be done also includes:
Strike can be done only after 1 year of incorporation even without annual filing subject to active DIN and no business since 1 year.
Note: 20A filing is compulsory if company is incorporated after 2nd Nov 2018.
For a company having ongoing business there should be no business transactions since 2 F.Y. and nil filings should be done for those 2 yrs, even if Nil filing for the past 2 F.Y. is not done, the company can strike off. Bank closure certificate must for companies having an account in the bank.
As both Directors’ signatures are required in documents it could only be possible when both are ready for strike off.
Can’t help out as in both affidavit and indemnity bond documents, DSC and signature would be required.
While applying for striking off of company, two forms are required:-
While E-form MGT-14 has normal associated fees, E-form STK-2 has fees of 10,000/-
Yes. Member’s approval is required through Special resolution for striking off company
The procedure is extremely easy and is completed step wise:-
One of the risks associated with the compulsory strike off process for a limited company is that you will not have the opportunity to realize and distribute the assets and share capital before the company is dissolved. That would leave you in a powerless position once it has been struck off.
Before the company is struck off, whether it’s a voluntary or forced strike off, its share capital, reserves or any other assets should be distributed to its creditors and shareholders accordingly. If the value of the company’s share capital is greater than that, the company should either be put into voluntary liquidation before the dissolution or the company should take steps to legally reduce its share capital before applying for strike off.
It is possible for a company that has been dissolved to be effectively brought back to life by a creditor with a claim against the company and for the conduct of the company directors to be investigated. As the company directors are unlikely to restore the company themselves, it’s most likely to be creditors who will restore the company via the court route.
Once the company has been restored, the creditors could appoint a liquidator to investigate the conduct of the directors. If the liquidator uncovers examples of fraudulent trading, wrongful trading or misfeasance, then the liquidator could bring court action against them. That could lead to the directors being made personally liable for company debts and/or a director disqualification.
A struck off company can only be wound up if action is taken to restore the company to the Register of Companies first. If a winding up order is made against a company that has been struck off, then the usual notices and the advertisement of the winding up order will not be issued. Instead, the official receiver will contact the petitioning creditor to inform them that the company has been struck off. They will advise them to make an application to the court to restore the company if they want the winding up process to continue.
If the petitioning creditor is unwilling to restore the company, the official receiver will consider making an application to the court to do so if there are substantial realizable assets or it’s in the public interest to do so. If the petitioning creditor and the official receiver decide not to restore the company, an application to rescind the winding up order will be made. If the petitioning creditor or the official receiver decides to restore the company to the register, then the winding up proceedings will commence. The liquidator/official receiver will complete their duties and the company director will face a full investigation into their conduct.